<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should You Use An Offline Blog Editor?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/offline-blog-editor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/offline-blog-editor/</link>
	<description>Learn How To Be A Successful Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 02:02:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob O.</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/offline-blog-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-24713</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob O.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 21:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=5065#comment-24713</guid>
		<description>More for the sake of how and when I write, I do almost all of my blog drafts offline.  I usually don&#039;t have time to write complete posts in a single sitting.  And often, I jot ideas future post down quickly and then let them simmer on the backburner, giving them a little stir from time to time until they become usable - or just get discarded altogether. 
 
So, I compose most of my posts in Notepad++ but store those in Google Docs so they&#039;re out in &quot;the cloud&quot; and accessible anywhere, anytime.  And I prefer not to use the WYSIWYG editor, drafting my stuff out in basic HTML instead.  Kinduva control freak, I guess... </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More for the sake of how and when I write, I do almost all of my blog drafts offline.  I usually don&#039;t have time to write complete posts in a single sitting.  And often, I jot ideas future post down quickly and then let them simmer on the backburner, giving them a little stir from time to time until they become usable &#8211; or just get discarded altogether.</p>
<p>So, I compose most of my posts in Notepad++ but store those in Google Docs so they&#039;re out in &quot;the cloud&quot; and accessible anywhere, anytime.  And I prefer not to use the WYSIWYG editor, drafting my stuff out in basic HTML instead.  Kinduva control freak, I guess&#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Peterson</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/offline-blog-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-22062</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=5065#comment-22062</guid>
		<description>Informative post! offline blog editors can serve as a  better back-up option, and for writing text when you are not connected to the internet. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Informative post! offline blog editors can serve as a  better back-up option, and for writing text when you are not connected to the internet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Serradinho</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/offline-blog-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-21975</link>
		<dc:creator>George Serradinho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=5065#comment-21975</guid>
		<description>When I use an offline editor, I just use it for the text and nothing else. I will still upload pictures and do aligning before publishing the post. I try my best to spell check, but there always seems to be some small mistakes. 
 
Thanks for sharing this info :) </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I use an offline editor, I just use it for the text and nothing else. I will still upload pictures and do aligning before publishing the post. I try my best to spell check, but there always seems to be some small mistakes.</p>
<p>Thanks for sharing this info <img src='http://cdn.bloggingwithsuccess.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: timethief</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/offline-blog-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-21963</link>
		<dc:creator>timethief</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=5065#comment-21963</guid>
		<description>I did a comprehensive review of offline blog editors that you can read in this post &lt;a href=&quot;http://onecoolsite.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/offline-blog-editors-reviews/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;offline blog editor reviews &lt;/a&gt;. I use a PC and my friend uses a Mac. I  found that windowslivewriter was my first choice and BlogDesk was my second choice. My friend has been using Ecto on his Mac for over a year and he recommends it. Although it&#039;s not free it&#039;s modestly priced. Another friend chooses to use Flock which is an amazing browser. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I did a comprehensive review of offline blog editors that you can read in this post <a href="http://onecoolsite.wordpress.com/2007/10/26/offline-blog-editors-reviews/" rel="nofollow">offline blog editor reviews </a>. I use a PC and my friend uses a Mac. I  found that windowslivewriter was my first choice and BlogDesk was my second choice. My friend has been using Ecto on his Mac for over a year and he recommends it. Although it&#039;s not free it&#039;s modestly priced. Another friend chooses to use Flock which is an amazing browser. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sudama chandra</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/offline-blog-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-21886</link>
		<dc:creator>Sudama chandra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=5065#comment-21886</guid>
		<description>Really, an offline editor is the need of hour.  I have been using blogger but there are a lot of problems writing a blog post in the editor.  When i write in words and paste then some html problems arises.  Table adding is a problem.  There always happen some mismatch of texts and images. Google needs to come up with an offline version.  You have emphasized a very essential point. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really, an offline editor is the need of hour.  I have been using blogger but there are a lot of problems writing a blog post in the editor.  When i write in words and paste then some html problems arises.  Table adding is a problem.  There always happen some mismatch of texts and images. Google needs to come up with an offline version.  You have emphasized a very essential point. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Creative Junkie</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/offline-blog-editor/comment-page-1/#comment-21789</link>
		<dc:creator>Creative Junkie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 19:42:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=5065#comment-21789</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t yet used an offline editor, although I&#039;ve been meaning to check out that Windows one. Even if it&#039;s just for the backup option. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#039;t yet used an offline editor, although I&#039;ve been meaning to check out that Windows one. Even if it&#039;s just for the backup option. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 16/28 queries in 0.030 seconds using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: cdn.bloggingwithsuccess.net

Served from: bloggingwithsuccess.net @ 2012-05-22 13:12:29 -->
