<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Case Study: How We Eliminated 93% Comment Spam</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment</link>
	<description>Learn How To Be A Successful Blogger</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 20:06:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-54453</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 20:03:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-54453</guid>
		<description>Spam! well before i started blogging i didnt know what it was, what was everyone worried about, in the last two months i have been blogging i have had enough of sapm to last me a life time i use askimet, it catches them but also good comments to. so i am going to have a try with this one, thank you for listing these plugins</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spam! well before i started blogging i didnt know what it was, what was everyone worried about, in the last two months i have been blogging i have had enough of sapm to last me a life time i use askimet, it catches them but also good comments to. so i am going to have a try with this one, thank you for listing these plugins</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 50 Must Have Plugins for WordPress 2.7 &#171; Blogging With Success</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1552</link>
		<dc:creator>50 Must Have Plugins for WordPress 2.7 &#171; Blogging With Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Mar 2009 10:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1552</guid>
		<description>[...] Bad Behavior: This plugin stops spam bots from visiting your blog and saves you time and bandwidth. It matches IP addresses to Project Honeypot database and blocks the request if found in http Black List. Further Reading: How Bad Behavior reduced spam by 93% on Blogging With Success. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Bad Behavior: This plugin stops spam bots from visiting your blog and saves you time and bandwidth. It matches IP addresses to Project Honeypot database and blocks the request if found in http Black List. Further Reading: How Bad Behavior reduced spam by 93% on Blogging With Success. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ROW</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1165</link>
		<dc:creator>ROW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 20:11:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1165</guid>
		<description>I am seeing a lot of such posts around the net these days and incidentally I also wrote a similar post some time back. 

Seems all bloggers are after spammers now :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am seeing a lot of such posts around the net these days and incidentally I also wrote a similar post some time back. </p>
<p>Seems all bloggers are after spammers now <img src='http://cdn.bloggingwithsuccess.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. I</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 02:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>Well, yes. If you don&#039;t see spam folder, you will not see the difference in comments.

But the plugin saves bandwidth also as spam bots are blocked right away and don&#039;t get to visit blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, yes. If you don&#8217;t see spam folder, you will not see the difference in comments.</p>
<p>But the plugin saves bandwidth also as spam bots are blocked right away and don&#8217;t get to visit blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve, show booths</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1119</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve, show booths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1119</guid>
		<description>hey Mr I,
i think my confusion is that I think a lot of bloggers don&#039;t bother to go through their akismet folder and just let the stuff in it auto dump. But it sounds like you do go through it.
so in the old days with just akismet you would have a hundred to sort through, but now because you have bad behavior running also, it completely blocks about 90 of them, and you then only have about 10 to sort through.
so for people that look through the akismet spam folder, this will make it easier, but for those people that don&#039;t look thorough it, this wouldn&#039;t make any difference. Am I right?
 ~ steve, show booths</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hey Mr I,<br />
i think my confusion is that I think a lot of bloggers don&#8217;t bother to go through their akismet folder and just let the stuff in it auto dump. But it sounds like you do go through it.<br />
so in the old days with just akismet you would have a hundred to sort through, but now because you have bad behavior running also, it completely blocks about 90 of them, and you then only have about 10 to sort through.<br />
so for people that look through the akismet spam folder, this will make it easier, but for those people that don&#8217;t look thorough it, this wouldn&#8217;t make any difference. Am I right?<br />
 ~ steve, show booths</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. I</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1118</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1118</guid>
		<description>Steve, Your answers:

1. No, it caught 60 and let through 1.
2. Well, the chances are very-very low (almost 0). Bad Behavior uses Project Honeypot&#039;s http BL (Black List) to match visitors IP with suspicious ones. If the IP is involved in spamming many sites, it will be blocked. 
3. Yes, infact we are running it. Even Bad Behavior is not 100% spam proof. 8-9 comments slip per week(and Akismet hadnles them well) but that is better than 100 spam comments per week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, Your answers:</p>
<p>1. No, it caught 60 and let through 1.<br />
2. Well, the chances are very-very low (almost 0). Bad Behavior uses Project Honeypot&#8217;s http BL (Black List) to match visitors IP with suspicious ones. If the IP is involved in spamming many sites, it will be blocked.<br />
3. Yes, infact we are running it. Even Bad Behavior is not 100% spam proof. 8-9 comments slip per week(and Akismet hadnles them well) but that is better than 100 spam comments per week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve, show booths</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1115</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve, show booths</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1115</guid>
		<description>hi Mr I,
Interesting study.
1. Are you saying that akismet let through 60 spam comments? I haven&#039;t had that experience, but my blog is new and small.
2. It seems like you are saying the problem with akismet was the &quot;false positives&quot;. Are you able to check what bad behavior dumped to make sure is isn&#039;t doing the same thing, or is the key that it blocks the people altogether and no one has mentioned being blocked?
3. can you run akismet and bad behavior at the same time. I like the idea of blocking spammers in the first place.  Steve, show booths</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Mr I,<br />
Interesting study.<br />
1. Are you saying that akismet let through 60 spam comments? I haven&#8217;t had that experience, but my blog is new and small.<br />
2. It seems like you are saying the problem with akismet was the &#8220;false positives&#8221;. Are you able to check what bad behavior dumped to make sure is isn&#8217;t doing the same thing, or is the key that it blocks the people altogether and no one has mentioned being blocked?<br />
3. can you run akismet and bad behavior at the same time. I like the idea of blocking spammers in the first place.  Steve, show booths</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. I</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. I</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:59:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>Probability of blocking good comments is very low as it matches IP with Project HoneyPot DB and unless your visitors leave a lot of spam, they won&#039;t be blocked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Probability of blocking good comments is very low as it matches IP with Project HoneyPot DB and unless your visitors leave a lot of spam, they won&#8217;t be blocked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iCan't Internet</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1109</link>
		<dc:creator>iCan't Internet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:57:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1109</guid>
		<description>I used to use Akismet alone, and it had about 95% accuracy. So, still had to check for false positives indeed.
Now I also installed Bad Behaviour, and it seems to be doing a pretty good job, although, I am a bit scared that it also blocks good comments...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used to use Akismet alone, and it had about 95% accuracy. So, still had to check for false positives indeed.<br />
Now I also installed Bad Behaviour, and it seems to be doing a pretty good job, although, I am a bit scared that it also blocks good comments&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eddie Gear</title>
		<link>http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/case-study-eliminated-93-comment#comment-1099</link>
		<dc:creator>Eddie Gear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bloggingwithsuccess.net/?p=1469#comment-1099</guid>
		<description>Hi there,

I been using Akismet on my WordPress blog for the last three years and have found it to be very effective. Even though at times I do find some spam comments not being bloced, I does some pretty extensive filtering. I feel it&#039;s safe as it keep you from shoving away potential readers.

Cheers.
Eddie Gear</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there,</p>
<p>I been using Akismet on my WordPress blog for the last three years and have found it to be very effective. Even though at times I do find some spam comments not being bloced, I does some pretty extensive filtering. I feel it&#8217;s safe as it keep you from shoving away potential readers.</p>
<p>Cheers.<br />
Eddie Gear</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 15/35 queries in 2.253 seconds using disk
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: Amazon Web Services: S3: cdn.bloggingwithsuccess.net

Served from: bloggingwithsuccess.net @ 2010-07-30 16:52:18 -->